<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Esquire &#124; Mac &#187; Spanning Sync</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.esquiremac.com/tag/spanning-sync/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.esquiremac.com</link>
	<description>Macs. Lawyers. Simple.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 01:04:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Wish List for 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.esquiremac.com/2008/12/wish-list-for-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.esquiremac.com/2008/12/wish-list-for-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 19:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>EsquireMac</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10.5.6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iLife '09]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iLife '10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod Touch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journler 2.6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac mini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Picasa 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snow Leopard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soocial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spanning Sync]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Hit List]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Things]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.esquiremac.com/?p=201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is my modest, if a bit geeky, list of things I&#8217;m looking forward to in 2009.  This is not so much a &#8220;wish list&#8221; as a list of things that are more or less certain to happen that I happen to be excited about (now you see why &#8220;wish list&#8221; was a snappier title). [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>Here is my modest, if a bit geeky, list of things I&#8217;m looking forward to in 2009.  This is not so much a &#8220;wish list&#8221; as a list of things that are more or less certain to happen that I happen to be excited about (now you see why &#8220;wish list&#8221; was a snappier title).</p>
<ul>
<li>Chrome for Mac (<a href="http://www.google.com/chrome/intl/en/mac.html">they&#8217;re workin&#8217; on it</a>)</li>
<li><a href="http://journler.com/community/forums/viewtopic.php?t=3684">Journler 2.6</a> (While Phil Dow had <a href="http://www.journler.com/community/forums/viewtopic.php?p=15316">originally hoped</a> to have 2.6 ready by the end of December, he has <a href="http://www.journler.com/community/forums/viewtopic.php?p=16254&amp;highlight=#16254">confirmed</a> this will not be the case. While he has <a href="http://www.journler.com/community/forums/viewtopic.php?p=16148&amp;highlight=#16148">considered selling</a> the project, he has <a href="http://www.journler.com/community/forums/viewtopic.php?p=16557#16557">confirmed in a private message with a forum member</a> that he intended to release 2.6 before deciding the future fate of the wonderful application.)</li>
<li>Group specific syncing of contacts between Address Book and Google Contacts (<a href="http://www.spanningsync.com">Spanning Sync</a> says they are aware of this feature request, but that it is <a href="http://groups.google.com/group/spanningsync/browse_thread/thread/3ec299dea356a473">low priority</a> due to &#8220;minimal&#8221; demand. Soocial <a href="http://getsatisfaction.com/soocial/topics/can_soocial_synchronise_gmail_contact_groups?utm_medium=widget&amp;utm_source=widget_soocial">claims to do this</a> but it doesn&#8217;t work. I expect somebody will have this down in 2009.)</li>
<li>iLife &#8217;09 (or &#8217;10 &#8211; iLife &#8217;08 was released in &#8217;07)</li>
<li>New Mac mini (<a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/08/12/15/mac_mini_makeover_considered_likely_for_macworld.html">Rumored</a> to be coming at MWSF next month, the current version is a bit of a dinosaur and not very powerful. We have one in our office, and it is a bit sluggish. We have been holding off, waiting for a Mac mini refresh for several months now, dying to replace our receptionist&#8217;s aging Powerbook G4.)</li>
<li><a href="http://culturedcode.com/things/">Things</a> version 1.0 (<a href="http://culturedcode.com/things/blog/2008/10/land-in-sight.html">Will be</a> released at MWSF 2009)</li>
<li>The Hit List (<a href="http://letmegooglethatforyou.com/?q=%22The+Hit+List%22+Mac">google it</a> &#8211; or check back <a href="http://www.esquiremac.com/2008/12/omnifocus-things-youre-on-the-hit-list">here</a> tomorrow)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.apple.com/macosx/snowleopard/">Snow Leopard</a> (OS X 10.6 &#8211; <a href="http://www.macrumors.com/2008/11/18/mac-os-x-snow-leopard-10-6-due-in-q1-2009/">rumored</a> to be released in Q1 &#8217;09)</li>
<li><a href="http://picasa.google.com/">Picasa 3</a> for Mac (Google doing internal private beta testing of a build for the Mac. Rumors reported <a href="http://arstechnica.com/journals/apple.ars/2008/11/28/picasa-for-mac-undergoing-testing-may-arrive-by-2009">here</a> and <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/08/11/26/google_testing_picasa_for_mac_beta.html">here</a>)</li>
<li>iPhone on any carrier other than AT&amp;T [<em>Warning: Rampant Unsupported Speculation Ahead</em>] (As I recall, the <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/07/05/22/no_cdma_comptable_iphone_for_at_least_5_years_report.html">initial reports</a> were that AT&amp;T had a 5 year exclusive with the iPhone. Then, at some point, reports came in that it was a 2 year exclusive. In my humble opinion, Apple would never tie itself to a carrier for 5 years [although, given my track record for making predictions, I am almost certainly wrong about this].  The iPhone launched June 29, 2007. There&#8217;s been <a href="http://arstechnica.com/journals/apple.ars/2008/09/30/two-sides-of-a-rumor-verizon-could-get-iphone-in-2009">some speculation</a> that Apple would announce a partnership with Verizon at the upcoming Macworld in January, 2009. Not likely. I would anticipate that Apple would wait until the end of its 2 year exclusive (say, right around <a href="http://developer.apple.com/WWDC/">WWDC</a> &#8217;09) so as not to encourage folks to hold out on buying an iPhone until it was available on another carrier. Of course, it is possible that AT&amp;T only has an 18 month exclusive, in which case an announcement at Macworld next months would be right on time. I&#8217;m sticking to my 2 year prediction, however, and, therefore, a June 2009 announcement for freedom from the bondage of AT&amp;T.)</li>
<li>Getting an iPhone (I have been greasing the boss-man to get us some iPhones for the firm. He&#8217;s indicated significant interest. Last week, I called him after I got done with a criminal trial. He said, &#8220;How&#8217;d it go?&#8221; I told him, &#8220;Well, it was awesome, I took out my iPhone and did some emergency research online and we got a not-guilty. Oh, wait, we don&#8217;t have iPhones&#8230; we plead guilty.&#8221; Seriously, though, I&#8217;m pretty sure I&#8217;ll end up with an iPhone one way or another in 2009. My Sprint contract is up, so I&#8217;m a free agent. I love my iPod Touch, but (1) I carry around too many gadgets that could be consolidated into one: camera, cell phone, ipod, gps; (2) I kinda want the internet wherever the crap I am &#8211; is that so wrong?)</li>
</ul>
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_brick-red" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%253A%252F%252Fwww.esquiremac.com%252F2008%252F12%252Fwish-list-for-2009%252F%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22big%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22Wish%20List%20for%202009%22%20%7D);"></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.esquiremac.com/2008/12/wish-list-for-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Calendar Sync News: Save $5 on Spanning Sync</title>
		<link>http://www.esquiremac.com/2008/07/more-calendar-sync-news-save-5-on-spanning-sync/</link>
		<comments>http://www.esquiremac.com/2008/07/more-calendar-sync-news-save-5-on-spanning-sync/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 12:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>EsquireMac</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Syncing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CalDAV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Calgoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Calendar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iCal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spanning Sync]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.esquiremac.com/?p=108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday, I wrote about Calgoo going free and Google Calendar supporting CalDAV. I also wrote in some detail about how our firm came to utilize Spanning Sync. Last night, Spanning Sync announced a new initiative to recruit new users. It is in the nature of a referral incentive program, and it&#8217;s called &#8220;Save 5 + [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><a href="http://spanningsync.com/?r=SJYCKM"><img class="alignleft" style="border: 0pt none; margin: 5px 8px;" src="http://spanningsync.com/s5m5-badge_150x150.gif" border="0" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Yesterday, I wrote about <a href="http://www.esquiremac.com/2008/07/davs-not-here-man-but-it-almost-is/">Calgoo going free and Google Calendar supporting CalDAV</a>. I also wrote in some detail about how our firm <a href="http://www.esquiremac.com/2008/07/a-small-firms-transition-part-ii-calendaring/">came to utilize Spanning Sync</a>.</p>
<p>Last night, Spanning Sync announced a <a href="http://blog.spanningsync.com/2008/07/your-friend-sav.html">new initiative</a> to recruit new users. It is in the nature of a referral incentive program, and it&#8217;s called &#8220;Save 5 + Make 5.&#8221; The idea is simple enough: If I (as a paid Spanning Sync user) refer you (a new customer), then you get $5 off your purchase and I get $5.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s an interesting idea. I&#8217;m going to go ahead and throw a link up here for my referral code in case anybody is interested in signing up for Spanning Sync. You might as well save 5 bucks while you&#8217;re at it and make me 5 bucks as well, because despite the fact that I&#8217;m supposed to be a rich lawyer, there&#8217;s a good chance I&#8217;ll be paying back my student loans well into my 50&#8242;s.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s the reason for this? Spanning Sync says:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Why are you doing this?</strong><br />
Since we launched Spanning Sync in March 2007, we&#8217;ve never done any paid marketing: no ads, no conference sponsorships, no press releases, no laptop stickers, nada. Just a two-page website and a blog. But in spite of that, Spanning Sync has seen great success, due mostly to the fact that our customers recommend Spanning Sync to their friends and colleagues. So in addition to saying &#8220;thank you&#8221; we&#8217;ve decided to actively invest our customer community with &#8220;Save 5+Make 5&#8243;.</p></blockquote>
<p>My guess is that, in light of the fact that Calgoo has gone free and Google is beginning support of CalDAV, they are feeling some pressure.</p>
<p>I might give <a href="http://www.calgoo.com">Calgoo</a> a try before I paid for Spanning Sync, since it&#8217;s free. I&#8217;ve never tried Calgoo, so I can&#8217;t vouch for it. I&#8217;m definitely a believer in Spanning Sync, and have been using it effortlessly and flawlessly for the last 8 months. Google&#8217;s free CalDAV support could be the killer gCal/iCal sync solution, but for now it&#8217;s <a href="http://www.google.com/support/calendar/bin/answer.py?answer=99360">way too buggy</a> to depend upon for a law practice, IMHO.</p>
<p>Spanning Sync 2.0 (presently in beta) does offer Address Book/Google Contacts sync, though, which I don&#8217;t believe Calgoo offers. At present, however, I&#8217;m not sure how much better it is than Address Book&#8217;s built-in ability to sync with Google Contacts. The killer feature, for me anyway, will be the ability to sync specific groups of contacts from Address Book to specific groups of contacts in Google Contacts. Charlie Wood, from Spanning Sync, <a href="http://betablog.spanningsync.com/2008/07/build-349-now-a.html#comment-124001946">says they&#8217;re looking into that feature</a>, but it&#8217;s not planned for the 2.0 release. No word on exactly when it will be coming. For me, that may well be enough to keep me on as a paid subscriber in 4 months when my subscription runs out.</p>
<p>Hit the banner above or in the sidebar, or: <a href="http://spanningsync.com/?r=SJYCKM">Click here to save $5 on Spanning Sync!<br />
</a></p>
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_brick-red" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%253A%252F%252Fwww.esquiremac.com%252F2008%252F07%252Fmore-calendar-sync-news-save-5-on-spanning-sync%252F%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22big%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22More%20Calendar%20Sync%20News%3A%20Save%20%245%20on%20Spanning%20Sync%22%20%7D);"></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.esquiremac.com/2008/07/more-calendar-sync-news-save-5-on-spanning-sync/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Small Firm&#8217;s Transition, Part II: Calendaring</title>
		<link>http://www.esquiremac.com/2008/07/a-small-firms-transition-part-ii-calendaring/</link>
		<comments>http://www.esquiremac.com/2008/07/a-small-firms-transition-part-ii-calendaring/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 04:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>EsquireMac</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Switching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syncing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Calendar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[calendar sync]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hax0r]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Zone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MarcoPolo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch Hedberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spanning Sync]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sync]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.esquiremac.com/?p=51</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the second post in a short series of indeterminate number about our small firm&#8217;s transition to a Mac-centric law office. Being a good 20 years younger than the next youngest person in our firm, I am, by default, the IT guy, or, &#8220;guy who does the computer thingies.&#8221; As I stated in Part [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><span style="color: #999999;">This is the second post in a short series of indeterminate number about <a href="http://www.hylanlaw.com">our small firm&#8217;s</a> transition to a Mac-centric law office. Being a good 20 years younger than the next youngest person in our firm, I am, by default, the IT guy, or, &#8220;guy who does the computer thingies.&#8221;</span></p>
<p>As I stated in <a href="http://www.esquiremac.com/2008/07/a-small-firms-transition-part-i-sharing-files/">Part I: Sharing Files</a>, when I started my job at my present small firm, the technology in place was decidedly low, substantially old and disturbingly Windows. In Part I, I chronicled our transition from all PC&#8217;s to mostly Macs in light of the particular problem of sharing files between multiple computers and platforms. This time, I am focusing on the transition in light of calendars.</p>
<p>Until I started my job with this firm, I never really used a calendar very well to organize my tasks, deadlines, etc. Organization wasn&#8217;t really my schtick. For my first 1.5 to 2 years out of law school, when I wasn&#8217;t temping with <a href="http://www.specialcounsel.com/home.asp">Special Counsel</a> (I highly recommend them, btw), I was in business for myself.  When I was temping, I generally just used whatever calendaring system was in place wherever I was &#8211; usually Outlook.  When I was working for myself, I was much less busy. I only had a couple of clients at a time, and the events and deadlines were not unmanageable solely from within my head (shiny as it may be).</p>
<p>When I started at my present firm, I was stepping into a fairly busy office, and taking on a significant caseload. The office did not have any type of computerized calendar system. The boss had a spiral-bound yearly calendar he carried around with him everywhere (and still does to this day). His paralegal had a similar calendar in which she calendared events. Hers served as a sort of backup for his.</p>
<p>It was obvious I needed a calendaring system, but there was no way I would carry around a physical calendar with me. I began using iCal. I created a calendar for my personal life, and a calendar for my work life. Out of sheer necessity, I began calendaring everything, personal, work, whatever. Almost overnight, I had become a calendar person. I never thought I would be one of <em>those</em> people! A great friend of mine once told me in reply to a compliment I gave to him: &#8220;I didn&#8217;t get this way because I saw the light, but because I felt the heat!&#8221; I often experience personal growth in the same way&#8230;Anywho&#8230;</p>
<p>Two or three days each week, the boss would call me down from my office and say, &#8220;Bring your calendar.&#8221; Well, crap. I either have to unplug and lug my Powerbook downstairs (which had a poor, aging battery that would only last 15 minutes or so by that point &#8211; my awesome wife eventually swapped batteries with me so I could have an hour and a half), or, I had to print out my calendar. I usually just printed out my calendar. iCal, if you have never had the occasion to do so, prints out some really beautiful calendars. They are clean and easy to read.</p>
<p>At the time, I was also dabbling a bit with Google Calendars. Google&#8217;s calendar seemed to have about the same functionality as iCal, but it didn&#8217;t print out as nicely as iCal&#8217;s, so I more or less stuck with iCal. Plus, iCal was not web-based, so I could access my events without an internet connection.</p>
<p>Anyway, the boss would call me down, and I would have to decide how many months ahead I should print out. I usually printed out 4 or 5 months worth. I&#8217;d sit in his office and he&#8217;d give me new things to put on my calendar. I&#8217;d write them in, then go upstairs and add them to iCal. I hated printing off a 4 or 5 page calendar every couple of days, though, as it was a significant waste of paper. And, when I reused old print-outs, I&#8217;d get confused about which events I&#8217;d already added to iCal and feared I&#8217;d forget to add something.</p>
<p>Using iCal, I could also sync calendar events through iTunes to my iPod Photo (the short-lived color display version of the 4th generation iPod with clickwheel that preceded the iPod Video). This was great for me to be able to see my events on the go, but I could not add events until I got to my computer.</p>
<p>Nonetheless, this arrangement worked fairly well.</p>
<p>Google Calendar became more appealing to me, however, because it resided in my browser and I didn&#8217;t have to open a separate application to slow down my aging Powerbook. Also, I liked the idea of being able to access my calendar from anywhere there&#8217;s an internet connection. I still couldn&#8217;t let go of having my calendar accessible offline, though.</p>
<p>For a while, I put all of my calendars on Google Calendars and then subscribed to them in iCal. This was not a bad setup. I would just open iCal once or twice per day, refresh my calendars, and close it. Of course, this meant I could only add events through Google, as the calendars were subscribed only &#8211; not writeable.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.esquiremac.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/picture-23.png"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-52" title="picture-23" src="http://www.esquiremac.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/picture-23.png" alt="" width="145" height="176" /></a><a href="http://www.esquiremac.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/picture-32.png"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-53" title="picture-32" src="http://www.esquiremac.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/picture-32.png" alt="" width="138" height="165" /></a>The manual sync eventually became a pain in the butt, and I thought of ways to make it more automated. For a bit, I used neat little applications like <a href="http://www.symonds.id.au/marcopolo/">MarcoPolo</a> and <a href="http://metaquark.de/homezone/">Home Zone</a> to detect when I got to work or when I got home and had it automatically open iCal which would automatically refresh upon opening. This solution eventually bugged me too much, though, because I didn&#8217;t always want to be bothered by iCal as soon as I got home or to work.</p>
<p>I decided that I needed both iCal and Google Calendar, and I needed to be able to add calendar events if I was offline.  My only choice was to get a 2-way syncing program, that is, one that would allow me to add events to Google and have them sync to my iCal and allow me to add events to iCal and have them sync to Google. I scoured the interwebs for a free solution and found <a href="http://gcaldaemon.sourceforge.net/">GCALDaemon</a>. I swear to you I tried to get this thing to work, but I couldn&#8217;t. I do not doubt that it can be done, but, at the time I was trying to use it, it was very clearly a hacked solution that was beyond my comfort zone. I&#8217;m no <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3fkYmO2B-sM">leet hax0r</a>, but I&#8217;m less squeamish than most folks.</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/3fkYmO2B-sM&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/3fkYmO2B-sM&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>My only choice was to pay for a solution. By the way, if I buy software, you can be assured of four things:</p>
<ol>
<li>it does what I need it to do,</li>
<li>it does it well,</li>
<li>there&#8217;s no other free solution that even comes close to doing what I need it to do, and</li>
<li>I <em>really</em> need to do what I need to do.</li>
</ol>
<p><a href="http://www.esquiremac.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/picture-4.png"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-54" title="picture-4" src="http://www.esquiremac.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/picture-4.png" alt="" width="390" height="102" /></a>I ended up buying <a href="http://www.spanningsync.com">Spanning Sync</a> for, I think, $25 per year. It works great. It is actually a preference pane, so you access it through System Preferences.  SpanningSync is really lightweight. I never even notice it&#8217;s running. I have it set to sync every 10 minutes, though you can change the frequency to suit your needs.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.esquiremac.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/spanningsync-prefpane.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-55" title="spanningsync-prefpane" src="http://www.esquiremac.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/spanningsync-prefpane-300x266.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="266" /></a></p>
<p>There&#8217;s not much else to say about SpanningSync, for now, except that its <a href="http://betablog.spanningsync.com/2008/05/spanning-sync-v.html">impending v2.0</a> (currently in beta) is going to support Address Book sync with Google Contacts, which promises to be a great feature. I will be writing about Address Book syncing in the near future.</p>
<p>My life got even better when I got my iPod Touch. I can sync my iPod Touch through iTunes with iCal, just as before with my oldPod, but the iPod Touch eventually allowed me to add events right through it (this functionality did not ship with original iPhones and iPod Touches, it was later added with a firmware update). This means I did not have to print out my calendars anymore!</p>
<p>I mean, the solution was pretty good before the iPod Touch, but still, to quote <a href="http://www.mitchhedberg.net/">Mitch Hedberg</a> (R.I.P.) in regards to buying a donut: &#8220;We do not need to bring ink and paper into this.&#8221;</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="332" height="316" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="name" value="comedy_central_player" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#cccccc" /><param name="align" value="middle" /><param name="flashvars" value="videoId=41939" /><param name="src" value="http://www.comedycentral.com/sitewide/video_player/view/default/swf.jhtml" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="332" height="316" src="http://www.comedycentral.com/sitewide/video_player/view/default/swf.jhtml" flashvars="videoId=41939" align="middle" bgcolor="#cccccc" name="comedy_central_player"></embed></object></p>
<p>There was one remaining problem with the situation. Unless I manually entered in my boss&#8217;s calendar events, I had no idea what his schedule looked like. In a firm with two lawyers, I&#8217;ve found it&#8217;s a good idea to know what the other lawyer is up to and what his availability is! I sure didn&#8217;t feel like scouring his calendar and entering all of his appointments. About a year ago, though, we hired on a very ambitions administrative assistant. She&#8217;s great. She&#8217;s the kind of employee that runs out of work and goes looking for stuff to do (instead of surfing the interhighway, like me!). She was bored one day and asked for stuff to do. I told her it would really help me out a lot if she could take the boss&#8217;s calendar at least once per week and add any new events to a calendar on Google that I created for him. She also adds new events I create for him online to his physical calendar.</p>
<p>So, there ya go. We have gone from two paper calendars with all their limitations to having all of our calendars on any computer with instantaneous updates throughout the Google Calendars and syncing every 10 minutes through iCal. Within seconds, I can tell you what our office is or isn&#8217;t doing on any particular day, or, I can add an event and know everybody else will be up to speed without any further effort. Good times, indeed.</p>
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_brick-red" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%253A%252F%252Fwww.esquiremac.com%252F2008%252F07%252Fa-small-firms-transition-part-ii-calendaring%252F%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22big%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22A%20Small%20Firm%27s%20Transition%2C%20Part%20II%3A%20Calendaring%22%20%7D);"></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.esquiremac.com/2008/07/a-small-firms-transition-part-ii-calendaring/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mobile Me, Probably Not for Me</title>
		<link>http://www.esquiremac.com/2008/07/mobile-me-probably-not-for-me/</link>
		<comments>http://www.esquiremac.com/2008/07/mobile-me-probably-not-for-me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 15:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>EsquireMac</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gmail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Apps for My Domain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Me]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spanning Sync]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SugarSync]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.esquiremac.com/2008/07/mobile-me-probably-not-for-me/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mobile Me launches tomorrow, apparently, but I&#8217;m still pretty sure I won&#8217;t be signing up for it. That&#8217;s not to say it&#8217;s not a great service, with some great improvements over .Mac. I just don&#8217;t have much need for it, especially for $99/year (or $89 for one year if you buy from Amazon.com) Calendars I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>Mobile Me launches tomorrow, apparently, but I&#8217;m still pretty sure I won&#8217;t be signing up for it. That&#8217;s not to say it&#8217;s not a great service, with some great improvements over .Mac. I just don&#8217;t have much need for it, especially for $99/year (or <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2008/07/08/apple-amazon-offer-boxed-versions-of-mobileme/">$89 for one year</a> if you <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Apple-MB611Z-A-MobileMe/dp/B001BY45QO/ref=pd_bbs_3?ie=UTF8&amp;s=software&amp;qid=1215492140&amp;sr=8-3">buy from Amazon.com</a>)<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><br />
Calendars</span><br />
I use Google Calendars, and sync them with my iCal, my wife&#8217;s iCal, and our office computers via <a href="http://spanningsync.com/">Spanning Sync</a>. My iPod Touch syncs with my calendars every time I sync with iTunes (which, for me, is every morning before I drive to work).</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Email</span><br />
I have no need, really, for push email, since I get IMAP service for free from <a href="http://mail.google.com">gmail</a> and <a href="http://www.google.com/a/help/intl/en/index.html">Google Apps for My Domain</a>. IMAP mail gets my mail to me plenty fast enough, with my mail.app polling for new emails every minute or so. Same with my iPod Touch.<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><br />
Address Book</span><br />
Spanning Sync 2.0 (<a href="http://betablog.spanningsync.com/">currently in beta</a>) now syncs contacts with gmail contacts and across computers (also, <a href="http://www.viddler.com/explore/tuaw/videos/80/" target="_blank">check this video</a>). My iPod Touch syncs contacts every time I sync with iTunes.<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><br />
File Sync<br />
</span>I don&#8217;t have much need for the file sync or online storage, since I use <a href="http://www.sugarsync.com">SugarSync</a> to keep files in sync and available for mobile access across multiple computers.  SugarSync does charge $24.99/year for 10GB of storage.</p>
<p>Still, the new Mobile Me seems like it will be a nice upgrade from .Mac, and I may even sign up for a generaous 60 day free trial to give it a spin.</p>
<p>Technorati Tags: <a class="performancingtags" rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/Mobile%20Me">Mobile Me</a>, <a class="performancingtags" rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/.mac">.mac</a>, <a class="performancingtags" rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/Spanning%20Sync">Spanning Sync</a>, <a class="performancingtags" rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/gmail">gmail</a>, <a class="performancingtags" rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/Google%20Apps%20for%20My%20Domain">Google Apps for My Domain</a>, <a class="performancingtags" rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/SugarSync">SugarSync</a></p>
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_brick-red" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%253A%252F%252Fwww.esquiremac.com%252F2008%252F07%252Fmobile-me-probably-not-for-me%252F%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22big%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22Mobile%20Me%2C%20Probably%20Not%20for%20Me%22%20%7D);"></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.esquiremac.com/2008/07/mobile-me-probably-not-for-me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
